Friday, October 22, 2010

Essay

What is Creative Commons
How is it different to other forms of copy right?





Copy right laws have one basic goal - protecting the authors of intellectual property from illegal redistribution of their work. Therefore this property cannot be shared or adapted without permission from the rights holder. In order for a potential user to access material with ‘All Rights Reserved’ they must ask permission - a process that is often difficult and costly.


The issue surrounding permission of use was a key reason for the existence of The Creative Commons (CC) in the first place. CC, instead of keeping ‘All Rights Reserved)’ to the permission holders, allows the creator to identify which rights they chose to carry, giving them greater creative freedoms. Therefore the creative ability of online media has been increased, while lowering the associated costs.




The cost associated with the redistribution of Copyrighted material poses a large threat to the creativity of individual authors and artists. In a recent documentary film, the filmmakers discovered a 3 and a half second clip with the character Homer Simpson, from The Simpsons, in the barely distinguishable background of a key informative shot. Homer Simpson is an ‘All Rights Reserved’ personality. In accordance with the strict Copy Right laws, the filmmakers were required to ask Fox Broadcasting for permission to use the footage they recorded which after a length of time was granted - at the price of $10, 00. (1)
Obstacles such as this are common, causing a massive threat to the authors and artists of creative material. Instead of being able to accurately depict the world in which we live - full of cultural products and copyrighted material - creators must painstakingly consider and remove any infringements to Copyright laws, if they wish to avoid these exorbitant fees and delays in procedures.

Before the invention and mass popularity of the internet it was not economically feasible for intellectual property to be fully protected or persecute those who do not adhere to the Copyright laws. Now, with most material available online, the content industry can easily see breaches in Copyright and have been attempting to prevent any infringements. In the past they turned a blind eye to small or unintentional infringement.

While industries and authorities are simply protecting their vested interests with strict Copyright laws, the All Rights Reserved concept has created an imbalanced enforcement of Intellectual Property. Creativity is restricted instead of stimulated, but without any protection the creative industries would suffer. Only a select minority benefit from All Rights Reserved and, in the long term, no one would benefit from the total abolition of copyright.

In attempt to rebalance Intellectual Property laws the Creative Commons was devised. New licenses became available, that allow more options in which rights are reserved, and which are not. ‘Some Rights Reserved’ has become a counterstroke to the restrictive standard ‘all rights reserved’ slogan.


There are various examples where the usage of creative Commons licensing has been a benefit to the creators and audiences alike. Musical group ‘Chuck D and the Fine Arts Militia’ released their single in 2005, “No Meaning No”. However it was not released in the traditional format. Instead of trying to legally protect their work from being circulated free online, they encouraged it.
“They posted the entire 3-minute, 12-second, in length song and its various vocal, drum and guitar components online and invited everyone to view, copy, mix, remix, sample, imitate, parody and even criticize it.” (2)
This resulted in masses of derivative work and interpretations of their song, and in accordance with CC, acknowledged of the original source. The band were so pleased with the result and publicity gained, they published their entire album in the same way, becoming the first major artist to do so.

In the same way, any worthwhile cultural product or idea will benefit from being disseminated widely, in a manner which is much better suited to the modern electronic age “Any idea or cultural product worth its salt can withstand parody and pastiche - drawing a moustache on a reproduction of Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa, for instance, does nothing to diminish the worth of the original.” (3) This is something that the Nine Inch Nails were also aware of, encouraging their fan’s to engage with their music, rather than passively listen. They distributed their Intellectual Property under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. Making sure users could clearly understand their right in relation to this album on the download site: (4)




“we encourage you to
remix it
share it with your friends,
post it on your blog,
play it on your podcast,
give it to strangers,” (5)




It’s not just music and creative industries that benefit from Creative Commons licensing. Another great example is its benefits for educational purposes. Specifically developed Creative Commons Open Education Resources. In their website they discuss the benefits in detail:
“Creative Commons provides the legal and technical infrastructure essential to the long-term success of OER, making it possible for educational resources to be widely accessible, adaptable, interoperable, and discoverable.” (6)

When Intellectual property is used in an educational setting, it is not commercial, distributed purely to improve the education of the students. For this reason CC enables;
“translation of educational resources into different language
educational resources to evolve and be improved through peer and student edits
easier discovery of educational resources on the web” (6)

None of this is possible if the creator choses to keep ‘All Rights Reserved’ instead of ‘Some Rights Reserved’.
The Creative Commons has taken the very important figurative ‘first steps’ away from the issues that surround the current ‘All Rights Reserved’ excessive model of Copyright laws. It has many benefits that Copyright do not provide. It is important to remember that Creative Commons, however helpful, simple obscure the Copyright issues rather than solving them.
In an electronically based society, we need to “settle on the proper parameters of digital information use, access, retrieval and preservation in the 21st century”. (7) CC has created an decent alternative to Copyright, without addressing the original issue. Creators can achieve a sense of correct moral conduct by simply placing a CC badge on their work without a real understanding of the issues, in much the same way a person will purchase a hybrid vehicle to appear environmentally conscious without understanding the basic issues behind global warming.



(1) http://www.spiked-online.com/articles/0000000CA401.htm
(2) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A35297-2005Mar14.html
(3) http://www.spiked-online.com/articles/0000000CA401.htm
(4) http://theslip.nin.com/physical/
(5) http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Case_Studies/Nine_Inch_Nails_The_Slip
(6) http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Creative_Commons_and_Open_Educational_Resources
(7) http://www.copycense.com/

Additional Research Sources:
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Case_Studies/DeviantART
http://www.actnow.com.au/Issues/Illegal_downloading.aspx
http://www.copynot.com/
http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:UTBV_ugENrQJ:www.ag.gov.au/agd/WWW/rwpattach.nsf/VAP/(CFD7369FCAE9B8F32F341DBE097801FF)~Copyright%2BLaw%2Bin%2BAustralia%2B-%2BA%2BShort%2BGuide%2B-%2BJune%2B2005.pdf/%24file/Copyright%2BLaw%2Bin%2BAustralia%2B-%2BA%2BShort%2BGuide%2B-%2BJune%2B2005.pdf+copyright+laws&hl=en&gl=au&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESh480hn-TAOoO4r_4-mXaNYre63PezvDjjQJo_KZwCScVuRqD8Qhmv_6C3PWlIHDB_oPVWNecGSkxNwI7QRiMiK7dWRN5Jis6GZ4fCPxMzPAqSrWtfTa82B16d1Pq-Y9aVsBkPr&sig=AHIEtbQirVYwAzABkaad2_87NlUEIIuwoA

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Week 9 - Tutespark

The next piece of assessment for this course is a 1000 word essay to be posted in this blog. There were a few topics to choose from – 6 to be exact- but it wasn't hard for me to pick one. For me question 2 was the most interesting topic:

Explain what Creative Commons is and, using examples, show how it is different to other forms of copyright.


 

I really like the whole idea of Creative Commons and Open source software, I really enjoyed writing my blog post on it – hopefully by picking this topic I can minimise the pain involved in these 1000 words.

As I have already researched and written about the history and beginnings of Creative Commons, I would like to learn more about the positive impacts CC has had on creative industries. I'm not sure if it's possible at this stage yet, but it would be very interesting to do a specific case study on how CC licences had changed the way an individual, such as a filmmaker, works.

Monday, September 20, 2010

Week 9 – Lecture - Cyberpunk

To be completely honest, I don't really understand what Cyberpunk has to do with this course.

To gain a better understanding of present communication technology we have looked at the past. So it makes sense with my current knowledge on development from the first communication technology to today we should be able to roughly predict it future.

However, to me Cuberpunk is a rather obnoxious genre. From my research, every Cuberpunk story's are cliché, featuring the same marginalised protagonist. Fiction is often a great medium to express an idea that is not fiction at all, but I get the feeling that Cyberpunk is simply a fantasy of some sad lonely writer, trying to heroisice their own existence.

I do agree with some of the issues raised. Questionable morality of technological advancements are becoming a major concern for some scientific disciplines, particaly concerning genetic modification and experimentation. Perhaphs, just as Geroge Orwells's 1984 raised concerns about the future of communism vs. capitalism, Cyberpunk is making the public think about the possible consequences of science and technology. I suppose my major concern, as a literally student, is the repetition of cliché characters and overall substandard writing in this genre.

This short story is just one of the many examples I came across, The Mission part 1 by 'That Girl". Under of the usual theme of, Corporate control over society this story is rather dumb. Perhaps I am just unfortunately coming across the wrong stories, but modern Cyber punk has nothing on classic fiction. Do yourself a favour and read George Orwell instead.


 


 

http://www.short-fiction.co.uk/newstories/show_story.php?story_id=4858

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Week 8 – Tutespark & Tutetask

Cyberpunk, as I've mentioned, is not really my thing – I really struggle to enjoy the genre. But this tutetask/spark helped me to understand why Cyberpunk has some relevance. Cyberpunk is a dark version of the future. The writing may not be in a style I enjoy, but the writers are trying to get a message across to their audience. Trying to warn us about the dangers of what can happen when we chose to ignore the negatives impacts of a technology based society.
I came across a very interesting article about our planet and the increasing rate of animal extinction. "There have been three major mass extinction events throughout history and biologists widely agree the world is currently suffering from another."- http://www.news.com.au/weird-true-freaky/world-facing-mass-extinction/story-e6frflri-1225913659680#ixzz126icWIq4 This is a major concern for many scientists, but worries me too.


 

This is my version of this news story, explaining this mass extinction in relevance to Cyberpunk.:


 

Earth 'facing mass extinction'

Major marine extinction in process - study

Organisms not coping with environment

Humans to blame

Janne Järvinen, celebrated Cyberpunk fiction writer has published various online works, focusing on the negative impact of technology on humanity and the environment., but recent studies from Macquarie University palaeobiologist Dr John Alroy is suggesting that perhaps not all of this is entirely fiction.

He compiled data from nearly 100,000 fossil collections worldwide, tracking the fate of marine animals during extreme extinction events some 250 million years ago.

The findings, published this week in the international journal Science, showed a major extinction event was currently underway that had the potential to be more severe than any others in history.

"Organisms that might have adapted in the past may not be able to this time," Dr Alroy said.

The research shows a combination of human behaviour and climate change could have devastating affects on species across the planet.

"When there's mass extinction all bets are off and anything could happen," Dr Alroy said.

The conditions of humanity in Jarvinen's work are eerily coming into actualisation. Bio-diversity is a key factor in maintaining quality of human life, so what will happen if all the animals become extinct? Will humans survive this extinction, and if we do, how badly will our quality of life and freedom be damaged? Jarvinen has possible answers for society in her fiction novels, but for all we know, they may not be fiction for much longer.


 


 

Reference:

"The World Through Mirrorshades

Next, I will name some of the themes or aspects which belong in my opinion to the cyberpunk genre. First of all, and what "the general public" usually forget, cyberpunk is a DARK vision of the future. The industrialization has polluted earth to almost uninhabitable state, nature is suffering, all the animals have become extinct, except for those cloned from the DNA-libraries afterwards. The gap between the poor and the rich has got bigger, governments' authority is run over by multinational corporations, which care little about anything else than their profit. Crime levels increase all the time and violent solutions are being made for everyday problems. Most of the people live in comatose-like state and submit silently to the "new world order". Concepts like "the System" or "the Corporate" are present in almost every major cyberpunk story. The not-always-too-heroic heroes, "Cyberpunks" live on "the Edge" of the system desperately trying to make their weight in battle for a better society. This battle is not an open war against something, but an everyday behaviour and not accepting the part corporations have planned for them. Postmodern themes include globalization, commercialism, mixing of different cultures and ideologies in one huge media flow. "


 

Monday, September 13, 2010

Week 8 – Virtual philosophy


 


 

Week 8's lectured focused on the idea of virtual reality. In all honesty, this was something I found very hard to comprehend. While I accept that technology is a part of modern reality, I struggle with the idea of technology replacing physical reality with virtual.


 

I feel that, no matter how realistic a virtual reality may seem, wouldn't you always be conscious that this is in fact not real? And wouldn't that consciousness ruin the experience for you?

Perhaps people more involved in the gaming world will be more optimistic about it. Personally, I hate video games, I think they are a waste of money, time and a big waste of your brain – so I'm obviously biased against this, I agree with Sidney Blumenthal's quote -


 

"Image-making, no matter how manipulative, doesn't replace reality;   it becomes part of it."

  • The Permanent Campaign


 

Although in theory the concept of The Matrix makes sense, I don't believe it could ever really work. Just like people used to believe that the world was flat.

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Week 7 – Tute Spark

This week's Tutespark was a bit more hands on. We have been asked to try some free software alternatives.

I chose to try out two – Firefox and Openoffice – and got two different options.

Let me start with Firefox.

Great program. Quick to download, very functional ... I'm not sure what it is about this program I like so much, but it has certainly replaced Internet Explorer for me!

OpenOffice... Not such a fan. To begin with I never really liked Microsoft Office programs, but hated OpenOffice. I guess I have been using Microsoft office programs for the last 15 years, and even though OpenOffice is free, iI'm still convinced Microsoft is better for my needs as a student.

I'll stick with Firefox, but OpenOffice is already in my trash can

Week 7 – Tute Task

This weeks Tute Task is to research and provide answers to 4 questions, so here goes:


1. What is creative commons and how could this licensing framework be relevant to your own experience at university?

Creative commons, as Adam explained to us yesterday, is a type of Copy Right License. Instead of the usual rigid 'All Rights Reserved', CC License has 'Some Rights Reserved'

"Creative Commons is a world wide project that encourages copyright owners to allow others to share, reuse and remix their material, legally. We offer a range of free licences that creators can use to manage their copyright in the online environment, each providing its own specific protections and freedoms. We have built upon the "all rights reserved" of traditional copyright to create a voluntary "some rights reserved" system."

  • http://creativecommons.org.au/learn-more


2. Find 3 examples of works created by creative commons and embed them in your blog.

There are countless works online , licensed under the creative commons.

They can be photographic;


Video (I really want to try that origami!):

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/p9xKxEV1FkY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_GB"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/p9xKxEV1FkY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_GB" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9xKxEV1FkY&feature=fvsr

Or even Audio:

3. Find an academic article which discusses creative commons using a database or online journal. Provide a link to and a summary of the article.

I found quite a few interesting articles about The Creative Commons, but the one that grabbed my attention the most was entitled, The Beauty of "SomeRightsReserved" by Molly Kleinman.

This was particular interesting for me because of it's relevance to my studies. Molly discusses the issues that copy right laws have created for University students, professors and libarians.

'These are difficult times when it comes to copyright on campus. Big music companies are suing fans, publishers are suing librarians, and the principle of "fair use" is under siege everywhere. Litigationhappy content holders have fostered a climate of fear in which every student is a music pirate and every professor a book thief."

She discusses how Creative Commons works and why they are such a great benefit to my , and many other student studies. – I highly recommend checking it out for yourself!

  • http://crln.acrl.org/content/69/10/594.full.pdf+html



4. Have a look at Portable Apps (a pc based application) – provide a brief description of what it is and how you think this is useful.

The first thing i have to say about Portable Apps is, it must be a scam right? The description provided on the website simple sounds too good to be true. Anything claiming to be this good automatically makes me suspicious. A completely free program that allows me to use my programs on any computer.

"Now you can carry your favorite computer programs along with all of your bookmarks, settings, email and more with you. Use them on any Windows computer. All without leaving any personal data behind."

But then I researched various reviews online, and it all seems to be legitimate. This would be such a useful program for my study, ill use the example of my Photography class. Photography programs are damn expensive and take me a long time to learn all the settings. If i was to use Portable Apps I would be able to use my photography programs on any computer – I think this would save me many headaches!

Week 6 Tutespark

T


The tutespark this week raised a question that had never occoured to me before today, which is slightly disturbing considering the amount of personal information, writing, images and ideas that I have published online without a second thought.
When I put something online, who owns it? Is it still mine, even if I post it on a website owned by someone else?
So, Who owns the content you put on the internet on various sites?

For me the most content I publish, is through Facebook. And it wasn’t hard to find out my rights about the content I publish.

Facebook privacy section told me that:
"You own all of the content and information you post on Facebook, and you can control how it is shared through your privacy and application settings. In addition: For content that is covered by intellectual property rights, like photos and videos ("IP content"), you specifically give us the following permission, subject to your privacy and application settings: you grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you post on or in connection with Facebook."

So thankfully, I still own everything I publish. I have the rights to who can see it, who can use it and therefore am still in control of my property.
But what about the information on this blog?
Quoted directly from the privacy section of blogger

" You acknowledge that Google owns all right, title and interest in and to the Service, including all intellectual property rights."


I trawled through various other sites, flicker, Myspace etc and thankfully I found they were all much the same. We have rights to what we publish. But this has certainly made me more aware of what I publish and how important it is to view the terms, conditions and privacy rights on any of these websites to ensure my information remains mine.

Monday, September 6, 2010

Week 7 Lecture

Week 7 lecture
In today’s lecture Adam introduced me to an idea I had never heard of before – the free software movement.
In a world dominated by technology, consumers often find themselves being ‘forced’ into purchasing software – you cannot buy a computer without also buying an expensive operating system. This put software proprietors in a very powerful position to create and distribute software the way they chose, at a price they dictate. Alot of people didn’t, and still don’t like this. One of these people was richard m Stallman, and he decided to do something about it.
In 1981 Richard created the Free software foundation. Allowing people to use, manipulate and share software for free. Consumers can buy and use proprietary software, such a internet explorer, but unlike the free program firefox, the consumer has not rights to change or fix problem with the program. These free programs support the 3 C’s Adam spoke about at the start of the lecture – Community , collaboration and choice.

Richard Stallman’s free software movement has resulted in many great free programs that allow greater freedom for the users such as Linux, Openoffice, Firefox and VLC. This opened the doors for the Creative Commons . Creative Commons (CC) is based on ‘the idea that we can voluntarily relax copyrights in the interest of sharing’.

CC allows creators to utilise flexible and relaxed licenses so that information can be shared freely. Instead of rigid ‘all rights reserved’ a creator can chose to have ‘some rights reserved’, their work can be shared and manipulated freely while the creator still receives acknowledgement. Personally, I believe this make a lot more sense. There are many examples online of people ignoring copy right laws and omitting acknowledgement of the original source or creator. If the licenses are relaxed then at least the creator recives acknowledgment.
https://learning.secure.griffith.edu.au/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_87375_1&content_id=_1376244_1

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Week 6 - Lecture

This weeks lecture from Adam Muir focused on the relationship between media and technology and its place in society. In this lecture we learnt about new media and the difference between vitual communities and individual identity
Adam explained this to us with two definitions:
Virtual communities: ' people carrying on public discussions long enough, with sufficient human feeling, to form webs of personal relationships.' (Howard Rheingold, 1993, The Virtual Community)
Facebook, Twitter and Myspace are all perfect examples of these communities. Just as in a physical community, a virtual community can partake in and spark discussions, share information and conversations that mimic the physical community.
Individual identity: “The Internet has become a significant social laboratory for experimenting with the constructions and reconstructions of self that characterize postmodern life. In its virtual reality, we self-fashion and self-create” (Turkle, 1995, Life on the screen)
And just as these virtual communities can mimic the physical, individuals can build themselves an online identity that mimics the way a person can create their physical identity. In the physical world a person creates identity through their social interactions and presentation: these online communities allow us to do the dame. A virtual identity can easily be deceiving however, it doesn’t take a genius to portray ones self with a different identity, I’m sure you have heard just as many horror stories as I have where scam artists, predators and even debt collectors can trick online communities into believing a ‘made up’ individual identity’
Social Media:
Social media is the dominate form of online communication, In the early days of the internet this meant people from all different demographics were able to communicate, when old communication technologies wouldn’t have been able to link them.
Only yestesterday my Mother happily informed me of all her college buddies who have been finding her on Facebook, and how nice it was to hear from them. Without a facebook page I can safely say my Mum probably wouldn’t have come into contact with any of these people. But in this online community, by listing schools, universities and workplaces as part of your vitual identity, it is easy to link with numerous other individuals we may not have ever had the chance to communicate with.

Monday, August 23, 2010

Week 5 tute activity

Week 5 Tutespark

Hi Class,

In line with the lecture content that Josh covered this week, we want you engage with the term "Culture Jamming".

Look it up, see if you can find what is considered to be the first Culture Jam, find the most influential Jam, the most damaging.

These 3 examples should be posted in your blog with an explanation of where and why they were found and used.

You can show what impact they had or are having too.

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Week 4 - Tutetask

1.Where and when did usable online video start?
Well, we already leant in our lecture this week about Netflix. An online DVD store and streaming service that arrived on the scene in ’98. But in 1998 the world was not quite up to speed with broadband; we were still on dial-up, where downloading a webpage could mean a week waiting patiently at the screen, only to be disconnected by an incoming phone call.
In 2004 American’s had broadband, and things were getting much faster with “half of American homes reaching better than dial-up transfer rates, along with all the noise created by the blogs and pundits of the internet, an audience was born, capable and accustomed to online payments (i.e. market potential) and finally able to watch video, on demand by the masses.”
http://dembot.com/post/310798115/a-decade-in-history-of-online-video
Thus it can be determined that youtube was the first online, ‘useable’ video. Users could, not only watch, but also upload their own videos.


2.In the lecture we heard about technological innovations that were used by the studios to lure audiences. (mostly to combat the popularity of TV)
What recent innovations are being used to lure us in the movies?
What are they luring us from?


When I want to watch a movie, I have a few choices. I can go to the cinema and pay up to $20 to watch the latest and greatest on the big screen or I can sit snuggled up in bed and watch that same movie, admittedly in low quality - but completely free from my broadband-enabled laptop. So why on earth would I waste my time in the cinema and how has the cinema tried to keep bringing audiences back?
Advancements in cinema technology is one thing that pulled me away from my warm bed and the illegal video streaming websites (not that I would ever break a law, of course). When Avatar came out in 3D, there was so much hype around the fantastic technology I actually paid to see it! Imagine that.
Just as in 1952 when 3d was first introduced to lure audiences back to the big-screen, we are being lured by bigger and better versions of this. Don’t forget all the hype about ‘gold-class’ and ‘High-def” cinema? VIP membership cards and special premier viewings?
All clever methods the cinemas and studios have employed to keep audiences coming back again and again. By creating a cinema experience you can’t replicate at home studios have been luring us back time and time again.

3.Are short films still being made? Why? Who pays for them to be made?

Short films are made for a number of reasons. The short film
Short films are constantly being made by amateurs and professionals all over the world. I would personally categorise them into 3 main types; professional film makers who have a message to deliver or something to sell, amateurs who don’t really know what they are doing and idiots with a video camera. The last two are usually self funded, but the first, the professionals are where the money is.
Professional short films are showcased at festivals, one of the best exam


4.The term viral is thrown about adhoc but what does it mean in film/movie arena? Give some examples.

Short films with interesting, funny or unusual subject matter, have a tendency to ‘go viral’ on the internet. A viral video will “spread like a virus...you watch it. You like it and you pass it on to a friend or everyone you know. They watch and like it, then forward the link or clip to more people...”. Sometimes these videos are clips from real life, like someone falling off a bike or when Gordan Brown was caught out describing one particular supporter ‘bigoted woman’ when he thought the cameras were off:


Other viral videos are highly rehearsed, well produced and have the intention of reaching viral status. This video for example has almost 35 million views:



Although these videos are highly entertaining, they are often pointless forms of entertainments that take the audience’s attention away from legitimate short films with some level of intelligent though behind them. They may be funny, but they certainly aren’t doing anything great for the film arena

http://humor.about.com/od/video/f/whatviralvideos.htm

5. Online video distribution isn't limited to the short film format. We are now starting to see television styled shows made solely for internet release (webisodes). Find an example of this style of content and discuss how viewing television content in this way can positively and negatively affect the viewer's experience.

Television shows are often available, not just on your TV set, but online as well. Audiences don’t have to worry if they miss their favourite TV show because they can just watch it online later anyway with resources like the BBC iPlayer. But from this, a different kind of show altogether has formed: the Webisode. Now ‘TV-show format’ films are being developed purely for distribution on the internet, giving TV producers and aspiring TV producers a chance to air their show and a platform for audience feedback.
Smosh.com is one, rather hilarious example of a Webisode. Two friends started regularly making TV-quality comic sketches that ended up going viral. The sheer lunacy of their ideas means that this program is not really fit for television audiences, but has millions of hits online. The video below where two boys dressed in boxes sing about transformers that “will punch you in the face!” for example has over half a million views:

On one hand, the webisode is a great platform for shows with unusual subject matter or a avenue for producers to showcase their talents or make money through advertising. On the other hand, we have the same problem as always with these short films, any idiot with a camera and a Youtube account can make their own webisoed – and cyber space is littered with them.

Week 4 Tutespark

Week 4 – Tutespark

Week fours Tutespark was an interesting one, find 3 short films that were made for internet distribution. I found myself constantly getting distracted, trawling through the hundreds of short films all over the internet. As we discussed in the lecture, the internet may not be a good thing at present for commercial feature length films, but it seems to be doing big things in the world of short film.
I spent hours upon hours looking through some of what’s out there for audiences to watch. Some of it fantastic, moving or heart wrenching dramas. I found some of the most confusing art-house productions i’ve ever seen. Some short films that forced me to think or to feel, others made me laugh with joy, or laugh in disgust at the poor acting and cinematography. I decided to post three short films that all do, and mean different things for the viewer and represents different parts of the online, short film genre.
The first one I decided to share was quite simply marvellous. A simple pleasure to view, well produced and executed:

Pretty damn cool huh? In this instance the internet has been used as a platform to showcase someone’s fantastic filmmaking skills and thus improves the art and craft of cinema – The internet is starting to look like a positive tool... for now.

Then I can across another one - Quite different to the last. A French movie with subtitles usually has positive connotations, but this was absolutely awful. It seems a bunch of armatures, who know very little, if anything about cinema woke up one morning and said ‘I know, today I will make a short film’ then threw some special effects in for good measure. I don’t recommend you waste your time actually watching the whole thing. The first 30 seconds is sufficed to let you know that you just wasted 30 seconds of your life.

So we have established there are some great shorts out there, and plenty of crap, irrelevant rubbish. But the most important type of short film, in my opinion, are those which communicate an important message to the viewer. I found plenty out there advocating for homelessness, addiction sufferes, the war-torn and many more. They used various techniques to make the audience sensitive to the issue raised and helped me view many subjects from an angle i may not have considered before today. The one I chose to share i don’t particularly like. It made me feel kind of sick and disturbed, but that’s precisely what made it so effective. It’s called ‘The Black Dogs Progress’ and is described on it’s website as ‘Tragic story of a dog's trail through abusive owners told through a series of cascading flip books’

Interesting isn’t it. The unusual format of this movie as well as the shocking subject matter helps to draw the audience in and keep them watching until the end. It makes me want to run down to RSPCA and adopt every single dog there so that they won’t fall into the hands of an abusive owner. There are stacks of great short films on the web, giving artists with something important to say a platform to speak their piece.
The internet is a massive tool, and in the world of short film, a fantastic one. We have been bombarded with rubbish, like that from our French friends in the second movie, but at the same time we are given masterpieces like the first and last film. And that, i believe, makes all the crap worth it

Monday, August 9, 2010

Week 3 Lecture Thoughts

Undeniably, i love my cable-tv, I love You tube and I love the cinema. Now, I was not totally oblivious to the fact that these are all new technologies; both my parents love to remind me how things were different “back in the day...”
However, instead of actually listening to long speeches about drive in theatre and sound-less movies, I usually rolled my eyes.
At the start of week four I was prepared for an hour of complete and utter boredom the second “The history of Film” was mentioned, but it seems I may have been too harsh on my poor Mother and Father - Film and Television actually have a rather interesting history. These two industries have been engaged in a constant battle for market domination since their beginnings, we can thanks this very battle for the many developments in entertainment technologies we take advantage of today.
I could write for ages about the developments in TV vs Cinema, but let me quickly outline the most important points. The most important part is not the detailed history, but rather how this detailed history has shaped the art and craft of film making.
Cinema came first – in 1895. Short films were shown often and were so popular some clever person decide to make a feature length film in 1906. It was humble beginnings and slowly this black and white, soundless cinema plodded along at a rather slow pace for a good 20 years, without TV to compete against.
1929 was the year of the first true-to-life movie. Audiences saw real colour and sound for the first time. In ’33 drive in theatre drove on into the scene, and animated film made an appearance in ’37.
Until now, cinema owned to visual entertainment market. That was until 1939. We welcome in the television.
The film industry, already a lucrative business must have been shaking in their boots. Throughout the 40’s and into the 50’s the two industries battled it out for the market and the money, which lead to a major developing in film – and it’s first major counter-attack to win the market– 3d film.
Now when I say 3D, you may think about the cool effects jumping out at you in Avatar 3D, not quite what they had in 1952 unfortunately. Remember those blue and red glasses? The ones that gave me a killer head ache as a child, and could never sit through the whole movie unless I felt like having a migraine that day? Yes, those ones. They were the cutting edge of technology and helped Cinema bring back the dwindling audience that were now investing in TV.
Then there was a brilliant idea for Television – playing movies on TV. Why go to the cinema when you can watch the same thing from the comfort of your couch? King Kong was the first televised movie in 1956.
A not-so-sucessful attempt by cinema to bring the market back, away from TV, was the feelies and smell-o-vision. It, quite frankly, creped me out to learn about this - I never actually thought these existed, outside of Aldous Huxley cult fiction novel “Brave New World”, and would have been much happier in my ignorance. Thankfully Huxley’s other descriptions of the modern world have not come into reality, so I feel safe, for now, as we moved onto the other developments that have lead to the fantastic improvements in modern society, like sponge-bob square pants on demand.
Come 1963, and VTR (video taper recorders) were now available for consumers to buy -$30, 000 a set? No thank you, that’s more than all my worldly possessions combined – including my car! Fortunately for the less extravagant the multiplex cinema was introduced in the same year. You could probably live in one of those things for the price of one video player attached to your TV set, so it’s not surprising that this was a popular option. But in ’97 TV and Video developed a consumer friendly, black and white, VTR player that didn’t cost the earth (you gotta feel bad for anyone who purchased the previous version). And then the VCR was released in ’69.
The 70’s and 80’s were good decades for video and TV, with the creation of HBO cable tv in ’72 and the introduction on VLD (video laserdisc). Laser disc players were available to the home market in the early 80’s, but were fairly short lived, replaced with DVD format in the late 90’s. HBO continued to grown in profitability and popularity and were marketing major completion for normal TV networks. This is where, one of my personal favourites, MTV, was introduced.
Film & Video arcade games came around in 82 when our good friends at Disney released a feature film with arcade video game to match. Blockbuster video stores opened in 85, the same year film started to be released to VCR video only – skipping the cinema market entirely. This is where all the most awful films, unworthy of cinema were destined. You see it still around today, low budget, poor quality films go straight to blockbuster.
Computer generated animation was a big development in 1988 that brought popularity back to the big screens and paved the way for ‘believable’ special effects. 1991, was most importantly the year of my first birthday, but also notable developments for society was the first ‘true to life’ computer generated character in ‘Terminator 2’.
The first development I actually remember experiencing was the film ‘Toy Story’ in 1995. The first totally computer generated feature length animation and god, was it cool. A good year for cinema it would seem.
And of course I remember the fist DVD’s - at the time (1997) everyone was amazed by this fantastic technology. It did take a while to catch on, but it wasn’t too long, 2003 to be exact, before DVD was king and VHS was obsolete, those brick-like cassettes are a bit of a joke nowadays really. DVD was great for TV and home entertainment; we got cinema quality movies in our own home!

1998 was a big year forDVD video and TV. We saw the beginning of High Definition TV, as well as the first online DVD movie rental service, Video on Demand and online video streaming. Digital projectors were coming into use for cinema without the need for that physical, old school ‘film’.

The Blair Witch project was a big deal for cinema in 1999, another win in the battle against TV. It was low budget and made hundreds of millions of dollars, and the ‘home-video’ filming added to the reality, scaring the shit out of me at the age of 9, I didn’t sleep for weeks.
Personal digital video recorders (PVR or HDR) like Tivo came out in the same year however, with just about evened the score. Now consumers could record the TV, fast forward, pause, VOD etc etc.

In 2002 the consumer could now legally watch movies on demand online thanks to Movie link, but it’s hard to compete against the abundance of free-illegal movies online today. 2004 was the year the first CGI-green screen feature films were shot. Without any physical sets required, real actors could be put against any computer generated background, this advance in technology film makers were given greater freedom in for making believable sets, especially in science fiction.

‘A History of Violence’, 2005, was the last major film to be released on VHS due to the popularity of DVD and the recent introduction of the Blu-ray discs. Now VHS had really seen its last days. Youtube grew in popularity too, 2006 saw 100 million videos viewed every single day - Which only increased when broadband was released in ’07. Today, practically any major movie a consumer wants to watch can be purchased online, but with a plethora of websites prepared to host movies free and illegally it looks as if blockbuster is losing its popularity and many people are choosing to watch it free, without needing to go down to the DVD rental stores.
But what does that mean for the future of film? Consumers have found ways to easily consume the products without paying a cent. The web offers little is any benefits to the film industry. Instead we are being bombarded with crap, low budget movies. Sometimes, amongst the millions of thorns we find a rose – a fantastic online, low budget film that can shot a talented film maker into the public eye. At this stage the internet is a horrid tool, crippling the film industry.
However it only early days for internet film - The next stage? It seems like it will be another win for television. The convergence of internet Film and pay tv seems to be heading towards a home cinema system where we can simply down load (and pay for) our films from your pay-tv systems. This will hopefully make high-quality, movies readily available from your TV. If we have this available in our homes, we will in all likely hood watch these films more often. When TV and cinema converge into one the two markets will hopefully co-exist in harmony.
Phew – a lot of developments for the space of just over 100 years? I hope your still awake after that, and like me, looking forward to the not so distant future for our beautiful flat screen TV’s

Week 3 Tutespark

Communication technology may sound like a modern advancement, right? Contrary to whatever many people believe, communication technologies have been around a very, very long time. Well before electronic communication came around in fact.
You may think something along the lines of Morse code as an early digital technology? Try again.... perhaps a few thousand years before Samuel Morse sent the first famous Morse code telegraph ‘What hath god wrought’ digital communication was everywhere.
Digits were a very early form of digital communication. Civilisation used their digits, (fingers) as a simple technology to communicate numbers and small mathematical problems. Before people developed the word ‘five’ or symbol 5 they would use five fingers to digitally convey the intended message. You would recognise this finger-reckoning arithmetic if you have ever tried to buy yourself lunch in a country with a different national language to that of your own. In Saudi Arabia a sandwich on a menu might cost خمسة دولارات, which quite frankly means nothing to me. But a gesture of 5 fingers would break down the language barrier, and communicate the price of that item to me. No need to go hungry thanks to your own personal digits.
In the same way that fingers were used to communicate a message, the world around was once a common tool. As someone could communicate ‘five’ with their hands, five pebbles, sticks, lines in the sand... any number of objects could digitally convey and intended message.
The Greek and Arabic nations were pioneers in early mathematical communication technologies, and advanced from fingers and objects to the counting boards and The Abacus. Instead of using whatever happened to be at hand to communicate, tools were created for the sole purpose of counting. These tools were especially useful for trading goods between two parties. A buyer and seller could calculate and communicate prices clearly, helping to minimize any confusion, especially when dealing with more complicated sums – The very early origins of a cash register.
And what about the native American Indians? They too made use of digital technology, as well as utilising their own physical digits for simple mathematic communication, they are known for their use of digital smoke signals to communicate a message long distance. Smoke signals were simple messages sent, not in giant words written in the sky as Disney may have you believe, but in a digital code. Messages were secret, there was no one standardized code common to all tribes. Two friendly tribes may have set up a communication system that only the agreed parties would be able to translate. If we want to think of this in modern times, imagine you and your best mate live 5km’s from each other. I’m not at all condoning urban fires here, but you could potentially set up a similar system...
One puff of smoke could mean ‘Come over, bring food’, two puffs could mean ‘Come over, bring beer’ and three puffs ‘SEND HELP MY HOUSE IS ON FIRE!’
Far too much trouble for anyone to bother with today, besides cub scouts and Bear Grylls, but would have been very useful to warn a nearby tribe of a pending invasion much faster than a man on his horse ever could. Who knows, it might be useful next time I lose my mobile phone.
Sticks, Abacus and a roaring fire... and I didn’t even begin to talk about the use of flags, drums, and trumpets... the list goes on. If we look back to Marshall McLuhan definition of technology ‘and extension of ourselves’ we can see these are clearly all communication technology, and technically they are indeed digital. They may not be exactly what I counted as Digital communication technology before today, but I guess it just goes to show exactly how far and fast technology has come.
History of the abacus- http://www.ee.ryerson.ca/~elf/abacus/history.html
Maths - http://www.everythingmath.net/mathematics-history.php
Arabic Maths -http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/HistTopics/Arabic_mathematics.html
Smoke signals - http://www.inquiry.net/outdoor/native/sign/smoke-signal.htm
Translator - http://translate.google.com.au/translate_t?oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&q=five+dollars&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sl=en&tl=ar&sa=X&ei=gElzTKiJBIbQuAOvhJnADg&ved=0CBcQrgYwAA#\
Morse Code - http://inventors.about.com/od/mstartinventors/ig/Samuel-Morse---Patent/First-Telegraph-Message.htm\

Week 3 Treasure hunt

Week 3 - Treasure hunt
... and then Tuesday mornings got interesting.
Not quite what I was expecting when I dragged myself out of bed at 7am this morning to my shrill alarm urging me to get up and start the day, but a more than welcome surprise. But of course there is a twist, this isn’t like any treasure hunt I have been in before.
The first thing that comes to my mind with the mention of ‘treasure hunt’ is childhood scavenger hunts for chocolate and sweets. This is education, this is different, plus 8am tutorial is no time for chocolate! No sweets or screaming children, rather than tangible goods hidden behind trees, today I am looking for information: Information kept in the depths internet, a jungle in it’s self.
Usually the internet can be easily navigated by its users. Like an explorer uses his compass and map, in modern times we simply ‘Google’ to find what you need to know in an instant.
Ten questions? ‘Simple’ you say?
Think again. Ten questions. No google, no Wikipedia even! Today I am navigating the internet without my compass... so wish me luck!
1. What is the weight of the world’s biggest machine? How much did it cost to build?
Quite simply, i can tell you its empty 203 tones when its empty, 592 tons when it’s full and cost a staggering US$3.5 Million.

The Liebherr T 282B is the world’s biggest machine on land - according to Bukisa.com, from the looks of those wheels, I don’t care if it’s top speed is only 65KPH, I wouldn’t want to be standing to close to that thing when it’s moving.
http://www.bukisa.com/articles/40463_worlds-largest-machines-ever-built

2. What is the best way (quickest, most reliable) to contact Ozzy Osborne?

Any internet savy individual can easily come into contact with practically any major celebrity through twitter. These days you can contact Linsdsay Lohan, Katy Perry, Lady Gaga and Ozzy aswell, with the use of your twitter accounts.
While this covers the dictionary definition of ‘getting in contact’ with our dear friend Ozzy Osbourne, in reality this won’t be of much use if you actually require him to solicit a reply Then book him to play your Grandmothers birthday party. Celebrity Facebook and Twitter pages are often used as a publicity tool and are managed or advised by a marketing or Public Relations agent.
Best way to contact Ozzy for ‘business’ purposes is through his management, Sharon Osbourne Management – give them a call on 310-859-7761 (Don’t forget your dialing codes for California and be prepared to pay big bucks if Granny really want’s him for her 90th)
If it’s just some fan mail your wanting to send try a website like www.contactvip.com, but be prepared to pay the US$9.95 a month for unlimited access.

3. When and what was the first example of global digital communication?
“What hath God wrought.” - Samuel Morse only words in the world’s first morse code message... How right bloody right he was. If only he could see the long path digital communications took to reach today where global digital communication means clicking the Skype application on my desktop to see my mother sitting in Malaysia and my best friend in Germany.
The first Global telegraph was a telegraph line from The USA to Europe in


4. What is the cheapest form of travel from the Gold Coast to Melbourne?

Offically, the cheapest way to travel from Gold Coast to Melbourne is free. Completely free, providing you’re an infant.
For the rest of us, it’s not so good, but you can still pick up a cheap flight from a variety of comparison websites out there. Unless you want to hitch hike (from personal experience i don’t recommend this), bike ride or walk it, flying is the way to go.
Flight comparison websites like Webjet and Skyscanner take the dirty work out of shopping around.
The average, non-student, adult individual can pick up a flight months in advance for well under $100 AUD. According to Skyscanner.net a 10:15PM flight with Tiger airways on the 28th of November will set you back a mere $46.25 AUD.


5. Who is Hatsune Miku? What company does she belong to? What is her birthday?

For me, this was too easy. Hatsune Miku is of course a vocaloid, but I knew that without needing to search. One of the advantages of having Good friends in Hokkaido, Japan.
Hatsune is a computer program who will, quite simply, sing a composition for you. She was born on the 31st of August.
For a girl born in 2008, i personally think her skirt is far too short – I was still wearing ones-ies and diapers when I was two.
(Source: Eri Swada, Telephone conversation via Skype)

6. Find a live webcam in Antarctica. Find a place to stay in Antarctica.
http://www.aad.gov.au/default.asp?casid=27 has four live web cameras in Antarctica. If you like what you see

7. What song was top of the Australian pop charts this week in 1980?
"Funkytown" by Lipps Inc.

http://funkytown.com/


8. How would you define the term 'nano technology'? In your own words, what does it really mean?
"Nanotechnology is the engineering of functional systems at the molecular scale. This covers both current work and concepts that are more advanced."

http://www.crnano.org/whatis.htm


9. What type of camera is used to make ‘Google Street View’?
Google street View uses the Dodeca 2360 by Immersive Media.

www.news.yahoo.com/nphotos/Google/ss/events/tc/012006google


10. Translate these questions into Klingon.


-1 nuq 'oH [the] [weight] vo' [the] [world’s] [biggest] [machine] chay' 'ar ta'ta' 'oH [cost] Daq chen

-2 nuq 'oH [the] [best] [way] [quickest] HochHom [reliable] Daq [contact] [Ozzy] [Osborne]

-3 ghorgh 'ej nuq ghaHta' [the] wa'DIch [example] vo' [global] [digital] [communication]

-4 nuq 'oH [the] [cheapest] [form] vo' [travel] vo' [the] SuD baS [Coast] Daq [Melbourne]

-5 'Iv 'oH [Hatsune] [Miku] nuq [company] ta'taH ghaH [belong] Daq nuq 'oH Daj qoS

-6 tu' [a] yIn [webcam] Daq [Antarctica] tu' [a] Daq Daq [stay] Daq [Antarctica]

-7 nuq bom ghaHta' [top] vo' [the] [Australian] [pop] [charts] vam [week] Daq

-8 chay' [would] SoH [define] [the] [term] ['nano] [technology'] Daq lIj ghaj mu'mey nuq ta'taH 'oH [really] [mean]

-9 nuq [type] vo' [camera] 'oH [used] Daq chenmoH [‘Google] [Street] [View’]

-10 [Translate] Dochvammey [questions] Daq tlhIngan

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

week 2

Week 2 The Language of Cine-Speak

Last week I learnt about the multifarious world of Communication technology – new and old. But one type of communication that did slip my mind in the definitions of new communication technology was film and cinema.
A film speaks to the audience; it can communicate many different messages, beliefs or even values. If I was to look at some examples: The movie ‘Ferris Buller’s Day Off’ could communicate an individual’s love for life and spontaneity, Wall-e could communicate someone else’s disgust for how we treat a fragile planet. Any Paris Hilton movie could express a certain individuals vain aestheticism and the wide array of ‘Adult Film’ can exposes a lot about someone’s more explicit desires: it is obvious that cinema communicates effectively to an audience.
But it is not just verbal communication or acting skills that communicates a message in cinema. There are so many other ways an audience receives and interprets messages in film and this is precisely where cine-speak comes into the picture.
A cinematographer provides the audience with information about the film, they provide this information to let us know exactly ‘Who, how, when, where, why and what’ this film is about. To efficiently communicate this, each shot is placed in a specific sequence and filmed for a specific amount of time as well the use of as shot size, distances and angles and focus.
In cine-speak, a cinematographer may, for example, focus the camera on an individual in a crowd to communicate to the audience ‘This is who this film is about’. Similarly, sweeping shots of a city, country or landmark may be used to communicate ‘where this film is’. The list of techniques goes on and on, to provide a limitless supply of options to assist communication through film,
A good cinematographer knows that a film can be strategically planned, in every aspect, to attempt to maximise the effectiveness of communication and ensure that ‘Every shot drives a narrative forward’.

Monday, August 2, 2010

Week 2 Lecture Thoughts

The Language of Cine-Speak

Last week I learnt about the multifarious world of Communication technology – new and old. But one type of communication that did slip my mind in the definitions of new communication technology was film and cinema.
A film speaks to the audience; it can communicate many different messages, beliefs or even values. If I was to look at some examples: The movie ‘Ferris Buller’s Day Off’ could communicate an individual’s love for life and spontaneity, Wall-e could communicate someone else’s disgust for how we treat a fragile planet. Any Paris Hilton movie could express a certain individuals vain aestheticism and the wide array of ‘Adult Film’ can exposes a lot about someone’s more explicit desires: it is obvious that cinema communicates effectively to an audience.
But it is not just verbal communication or acting skills that communicates a message in cinema. There are so many other ways an audience receives and interprets messages in film and this is precisely where cine-speak comes into the picture.
A cinematographer provides the audience with information about the film, they provide this information to let us know exactly ‘Who, how, when, where, why and what’ this film is about. To efficiently communicate this, each shot is placed in a specific sequence and filmed for a specific amount of time as well the use of as shot size, distances and angles and focus.
In cine-speak, a cinematographer may, for example, focus the camera on an individual in a crowd to communicate to the audience ‘This is who this film is about’. Similarly, sweeping shots of a city, country or landmark may be used to communicate ‘where this film is’. The list of techniques goes on and on, to provide a limitless supply of options to assist communication through film,
A good cinematographer knows that a film can be strategically planned, in every aspect, to attempt to maximise the effectiveness of communication and ensure that ‘Every shot drives a narrative forward’.

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Week 1 Lecture Thoughts & Tutespark

How do we distinguish between old and new communication technologies? Under what circumstances will new communication technologies become old communication technologies? And my thoughts on the first lecture.
So perhaps one of the best ways to transcribe the way in which my thoughts on New Communications technology has changed, from this very first lecture, is to explain a bit about my previous thoughts on what Communication technology was.
If I had of been asked yesterday what Comm. Tech is, I probably would have said something along the line of ‘Phones and stuff..’, but let me tell you, it’s a much greater part of modern life than my naive definition.
Communication, I discovered, comes in many forms other than verbal and has many outlets. Aristotle defined communication in much the same way as I would have:

‘The speaker produces a message that is heard by the listener.’

As fantastic as Aristotle was, I think it is defiantly saying something that my definition was congruent with one that was already defined 2500 years ago. In Aristotle’s day the world was an entirely different place, technology to communicate was fairly limited to verbal or written. Today I can communicate to 429 of my closest friends in seconds with a quick Status update from my Blackberry, no matter where I am or what I’m doing. I wonder what Aristotle would have to say about that? Something was telling me a modern definition was neccicary; thankfully we were given one from Shannon & Weaver:
‘The speaker produces an effect on the transmitter which sends a message (which is degraded by the noise of the transmission process) that is intercepted by the receiver which converts it into an effect that is heard by the listener.’
Starting to sound like something that has room for my Blackberry in it definition, but still isn’t quite perfect, is it?
Now, I don’t want to be quoting my lecturers the whole way through this post, but those clever lads quickly raised the essential prerequisite for effective communication, missing from this definition: intersubjectivity and intertextuality.
Whatever it is your trying to communicate it will always be interpreted, changed and contextualised. Even though I personally think my opinions are 100% perfectly correct, 100% of the time, unfortunately not everyone will agree.
A priest in Nigeria and a homeless New Yorker will obviously have a different take on the world. To effectively communicate there has to be opportunities for these different views to be taken into consideration.

So already you should be able to tell, the first 10 minutes of my first lecture has changed my definition - From ‘Phones and stuff’, allowing for verbal communication, into a much broader definition. There is now room in this definition for the masses of communication technology (which include opportunities for intertexutality and intersubjectivity) available to us today. And thankfully that was the next thing the lecture hall discussed.

I really like the definition of technology given to us from Marshall McLuhan, which basically said technology is an extension of us. My pen is an extension of my hand, the wheel on my bike is an extension of my legs... and on it goes. So then I started to consider these two definitions and what they mean together as a communication technology. Any tool that aids my ability to communicate a message, which is an extension of my mind, can then be defined as communication technology.

Communication technology has been around a long time in an analog form and more recently digital came into the picture - and isn’t it fantastic. Analog is seldom used at present, some people still prefer analog for certain uses: For reasons unknown to me I always prefer to use my film cameras rather than my soul-less, shinny, 12mp digital camera: other than that one exception I devotedly use digital technology.
And this is where the difference clearly lies between new and old communication Technology. Analog is fading fast from my life, and it wouldn’t surprise me if it hasn’t completely faded from yours. It’s replacement by digital has it heading towards obsolete - which is exactly what defines it as old technology. If you had to define a new Communication Technology, a single word would do: Digital.

Digital technology allows for wide audiences, Mobiles, internet, television, social networking, Flickr, Youtube and of course, the technology I am using this very second, blogs. I can potentially communicate with a large part of technologically prevalent world. On Youtube for example I have the potential to communicate my thoughts or ideas with an online video that millions may watch, comment on, like and share with others. On Flickr, it is much the same. I can communicate my photographs (or as McLuhan may describe it, extensions of my eyes) to the 40-odd million Flickr members, who can save, comment, tag and share my photographs.

I suddenly feel the world getting smaller, and this is where the technology has started to reach a convergence. We are heading to the point where I can access all the communication technology my heart desires with one all encompassing tool. Computers have converged so many aspects of technology, to the point where I no longer use, or even own for that matter, a land line telephone. Instead I click a few buttons on my laptop and Skype who ever I needed to converse with. Or I can click a few different buttons on my laptop and post a tweet to some of the 75 million twitter users. The computer seems to be a pretty usefull convergence tool.
But then we take a few steps further towards total convergence. We have the beautiful, radiant cult item for communication technology, and I bet you can guess which one I mean. The iphone. In fact, there is a myriad of palm-size smart phones on the market trying to do the same thing – converge all your communication technologies into one, fabulous communication technology tool.

Analog defiantly defines the old. Digital defines our New communication technology, but convergence defines the future.

Surprising what you can learn in a 50 minute lecture, isn’t it?





http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/blogspotting/archives/2009/04/flickr_as_a_soc.html

Monday, July 26, 2010

My general feelings towards a blog...

I'm finding it a bit intimidating to writing my own blog, considering my general hatred for blogs... every blog I have trawled through seems to be an avenue for someone to publicize their physical or mental vanity. Now I find myself writing one for a major piece of assessment, making me feel somewhat hypocritical.

However, I am more than happy to write one as part of my course - At this point, I haven't the slightest clue what I will do after my degree. Maybe if I can take full advantage of every learning opportunity that comes my way, I might be prepared for whatever awaits me at the end of my sentence at Griffith.



And maybe I can try and make less grammar & spelling errors while I'm at it